Gov AI integrates reporting from lawful signals collection and from people in the field into the same picture as open-source and geospatial intelligence. Field reports arrive in structured formats with a receipt and a chain of custody, are graded on the Admiralty scale and checked against what the platform already holds, while tasking orders, unit safety checks and requests for information connect the desk to the teams who collect. The platform does not intercept communications; it manages and fuses the reporting your authorized systems and officers produce.
Officers and teams submit spot reports in SALUTE format, suspicious activity reports, field interviews, contact reports and situation reports, at the desk or from a field device with a signed submission. Each report receives a receipt number, a precedence from flash to routine and a hash-verified custody chain.
Every report is graded for source reliability and information credibility on the Admiralty scale, with the basis written down. The platform checks it against other reports, fused signals, unit positions and identifiers on file, such as plates and phone numbers, and counts only independent sources as corroboration.
Reporting from partner and lawful collection systems is recorded with its source type, classification, compartments and grade, and joins the provenance chain like any other source. Phone numbers can be enriched through directory and network-register lookups that return registration, home network and porting status.
Compose numbered orders in SMEAC form from live records, each paragraph citing the intelligence behind it. Before issue, a gate checks deconfliction, unit availability, a stated end state and a named legal basis and approval for every intrusive step; recipients acknowledge, and changes go out as versioned fragmentary orders.
A register of the teams and officers in the field holds their members, tasking and last known position with its age and uncertainty. Missed check-ins and duress escalate along a defined ladder, and a position inferred from a collection lane is never presented as a check-in.
Questions from investigators, patrols and partner agencies receive a reference and a latest-time-of-value deadline, and are checked against existing holdings before new collection is spent. Answers cite their records, are reviewed where required, are delivered within the requester’s clearance and are rated by the person who asked.
No. Gov AI is not an interception system. It integrates reporting produced by collection your agency or its partners are lawfully authorized to run, together with that reporting’s classification and handling caveats.
Gov AI records, grades, protects and fuses human-source reporting such as contact reports and field interviews. It is not a source recruitment or agent-handling system, and those functions stay under your agency’s own governed processes.
Reports carry classification markings and compartments, reads are checked against each user’s clearance, and records withheld from a user are counted rather than silently hidden. Field packets are watermarked to their recipient, and every release is audited.
The Admiralty system, also used across NATO, grades a source’s reliability from A to F and the credibility of a piece of information from 1 to 6 separately, so a reliable source reporting something uncorroborated is read differently from an unknown source reporting something confirmed elsewhere.
See signals and human intelligence working on your own sources, in a secure environment with clearance verification.